Monday, February 5 |
07:00 - 08:45 |
Breakfast ↓ Breakfast is served daily between 7 and 9am in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
08:45 - 09:00 |
Introduction and Welcome by BIRS Station Manager (TCPL 201) |
09:00 - 10:00 |
Frank De Zeeuw: Ordinary lines in space ↓ The Sylvester-Gallai theorem states that if a finite set of points in the real plane is not contained in a line, then it spans at least one ordinary line, i.e. a line containing exactly two of the points. In fact, such a set always spans a linear number of ordinary lines, and that is best possible because there are point sets on cubic curves that determine only a linear number of ordinary lines.
One can consider the same question in three-dimensional space. By projection, the results in the plane hold word-for-word in space. But note that the known constructions with a linear number of ordinary lines are contained in a plane. I will show that if one assumes that the point set does not have too many points on a plane, then it spans a quadratic number of ordinary lines. More precisely, for any a<1 there is a c>0 such that if we have n points in space with at most an points on a plane, then there are at least cn^2 ordinary lines. The proof uses projection, Beck’s theorem, and a variant of the Sylvester-Gallai theorem. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:30 - 11:00 |
Boris Bukh: On a topological version of Pach's overlap theorem ↓ Pach showed that every d+1 sets of points Q_1,..,Q_{d+1} in R^d contain linearly-sized subsets P_i in Q_i such that all the transversal simplices that they span intersect. We show, by means of an example, that a topological extension of Pach's theorem does not hold with subsets of size C(log n)^{1/(d-1)}. We show that this is tight in dimension 2, for all surfaces other than S^2. Surprisingly, the optimal bound for S^2 is (log n)^{1/2}. This improves upon results of Barany, Meshulam, Nevo, Tancer. Joint work with Alfredo Hubard. (TCPL 201) |
11:00 - 11:30 |
Zoltan Furedi: Tight paths and matchings in convex geometric hypergraphs ↓ A {\em convex geometric hypergraph} or {\em cgh} is a hypergraph whose vertices form a convex polygon in the plane.
It will be convenient to place the vertices in clockwise order on the vertices of a regular polygon \vbγn (for n≥3),
and to write v1<v2<⋯<vn<v1 to denote that the clockwise ordering of the vertices \vbγn is (v1,v2,…,vn,v1).
We write cgg (cgh, cg r-graph) as abbreviation for convex geometric graph (convex geometric hypergraph, convex geometric r-graph),
Given an r-uniform cgh F, let \ex↻(n,F) be
the maximum number of edges in
an r-uniform cgh on n vertices that does not contain F.
In the case of graphs, this problem has a rich history with applications to a variety of problems in combinatorial geometry.
Extremal questions for convex geometric graphs and hypergraphs are connected to a variety of topics in discrete geometry
(see for instance Bra{\ss}, Rote, and Swanepoel~2001, %\cite{Brass-Rote-Swanepoel},
Pach and Pinchasi~2013, %\cite{Pach-Pinchasi})
and questions
around the triangle removal problem (see Section 4.3 in Aronov, Dujmovi\v{c}, Morin, Ooms and da Silveira~2017, %\cite{Aronov},
Gowers and Long~2016 %\cite{Gowers-Long}
and Loh~2016). %\cite{Loh})
We focus on the case that F is a certain type of embedding of a tight path or matching. We obtain in many cases asymptotically
sharp estimates for \ex↻(n,F), generalizing classical results of Kupitz and Perles.
As a consequence, we show that the number of edges in an n-vertex r-graph containing no tight k-edge path is at most
(k−1)(r−1)r(nr−1).
The case r=2 is the Erd\H{o}s-Gallai Theorem. For r≥3, this is the first non-trivial upper bound on the extremal number for tight paths in r-graphs which applies for all k≥3, and marks progress towards Kalai's tight tree conjecture. (TCPL 201) |
11:50 - 12:00 |
Group Photo ↓ Meet in foyer of TCPL to participate in the BIRS group photo. The photograph will be taken outdoors, so dress appropriately for the weather. Please don't be late, or you might not be in the official group photo! (TCPL Foyer) |
12:00 - 13:00 |
Lunch ↓ Lunch is served daily between 11:30am and 1:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
13:00 - 14:00 |
Guided Tour of The Banff Centre ↓ Meet in the Corbett Hall Lounge for a guided tour of The Banff Centre campus. (Corbett Hall Lounge (CH 2110)) |
14:00 - 14:30 |
Geza Toth: The Crossing Lemma for Multigraphs ↓ The crossing number cr(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of crossings
over all possible drawings of G on the plane.
According to the Crossing Lemma, for any simple graph G
with n vertices and e≥4n edges, cr(G)≥164e3n2.
Clearly, this result does not hold for multigraphs (graphs with parallel edges
or loops). We find natural conditions that imply the analogue of the
Crossing Lemma for multigraphs. (TCPL 201) |
14:30 - 15:00 |
Joshua Zahl: Unit distances in three dimensions ↓ I will discuss a recent improvement to the unit distance problem in three dimensions. A key step is a new method for cutting circles in R^3 into pseudo-segments, which leads to improved incidence bounds for points and circles. (TCPL 201) |
15:00 - 15:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:30 - 16:00 |
Misha Rudnev: Geometric incidence type results in the plane over the prime field ↓ The plan is to review some better or less known results about incidences of sufficiently small noncollinear point sets with straight lines. The two best known and in some sense sharp results are the theorem on distinct directions proved in the 90s by T. Szonyi and the recent Szemeredi–Trotter type incidence theorem by S. Stevens and F. de Zeeuw. Can further progress be expected to come reasonably soon? (TCPL 201) |
16:30 - 17:00 |
Open problem session (TCPL 201) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner ↓ A buffet dinner is served daily between 5:30pm and 7:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |