Wednesday, August 10 |
07:00 - 08:45 |
Breakfast ↓ Breakfast is served daily between 7 and 9am in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
09:00 - 10:00 |
Edda Klipp: Entropic regulation of dynamical metabolic processes ↓ Life depends on the input of energy, either directly provided by sunlight or in form of high- energy matter. The rules and conditions for the conversion of chemical or electromagnetic energy into living structure and all the processes related with life are governed by the laws of thermodynamics. Hence, to understand the potential and the limitations of cell growth and metabolism, it is unavoidable to take these laws into account. During the last years, systems biology has developed many mathematical models aiming to describe steady states and dynamic behavior of cellular processes in qualitative and quantitative terms. The validity of the model predictions depends strongly on whether the model formulation is in agreement with the laws of physics, chemistry, and, specifically, thermodynamics. Here, we review basic principles of thermodynamics for equilibrium and non-equilibrium processes as well as for closed and open systems as far as they concern processes of life and development. We illustrate the application of thermodynamic laws for some practical cases that are currently intensively studied in systems and computational biology. Specifically, we will discuss the concept of entropy production and energy dissipation for isolated and open systems and its interpretation for the feasibility of biological processes, especially metabolism. These findings are very important for biotechnological processes where energy dissipation should be limited. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:30 - 11:00 |
Alexander Moffett: Cheater suppression and stochastic clearance through quorum sensing ↓ Quorum sensing is a process through which bacteria can regulate gene expression according to their population density. The reasons for why bacteria use quorum sensing to regulate production of “public goods”, biochemical products that benefit nearby bacteria, are not entirely clear. We use mathematical modeling to explore how quorum sensing compares to other strategies for controlling production of public goods, namely unconditional production independent on population density, in small populations of bacteria where the random nature of growth is significant. Our model captures both how likely “cheater” strains, which do not produce public goods but benefit from them, are to take over a population and how long on average the population will last before going extinct. We find that depending on how expensive public good production is and how critical public goods are for growth, quorum sensing can decrease or increase the mean time to extinction compared with unconditional production, while always reducing the likelihood of cheaters taking over. Our results could have important implications for the growth of bacterial infections, for example Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections of the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. (TCPL 201) |
11:00 - 11:30 |
Michael Hinczewski: Controlling stochastic biophysical processes, from protein folding to evolution ↓ The chemical reaction networks that regulate living systems are all stochastic to varying degrees. The resulting randomness affects biological outcomes at multiple scales, from the probability that a single protein molecule successfully finds its folded state to the evolutionary trajectory of a population of cells. Understanding how the distribution of these outcomes changes over time is often difficult, and achieving control over this distribution via external interventions is an even more complex challenge. Intriguingly, this problem has close parallels in a very different domain: manipulating quantum states for applications like quantum computing and cold atom transport. In this talk we show how one can translate quantum control into the classical realm of biology, giving us a novel tool for steering biological processes. We illustrate this idea through two examples: the first is controlling the distribution of genetic variants in an evolving cellular population. This is motivated by recent efforts to combat antibiotic resistance via therapies that guide the evolution of pathogens toward maximized drug sensitivity. The second example involves controlling the distribution of protein folding states using so-called molecular chaperones: protein enzymes that facilitate the unfolding or disaggregating of misfolded proteins. The theoretical framework behind these two examples is quite general, and can in principle be used in many other biophysical problems. It also allows one to explore the thermodynamic costs associated with control. References: Iram, Dolson, Chiel et al., Nature Physics 17, 135 (2021); Ilker et al., Phys. Rev. X 12, 021048 (2022). (TCPL 201) |
11:30 - 13:00 |
Lunch ↓ Lunch is served daily between 11:30am and 1:30pm in the Vistas Dining Room, the top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |
13:30 - 14:30 |
Armita Nourmohammad: Organization and encoding of memory in evolving environments ↓ Biological systems, ranging from the brain to the immune system, store memory of molecular interactions to efficiently recognize and respond to stimuli. However, the strategies to encode memory can vary largely across different systems. In this talk, I will discuss how statistics and dynamics of stimuli should determine the optimal memory encoding strategies in biological networks. In particular, I will contrast the compartmentalized memory in the adaptive immune system, which primarily interacts with evolving pathogens, with the distributed memory in the olfactory cortex, which interacts with relatively static odor molecules. Focusing on the adaptive immune system, I will discuss how memory encoding could be understood in light of host-pathogen coevolution. Specifically, I will show that to achieve a long-term benefit for the host, immune memory should be actively regulated, with a preference for cross-reactive receptors with a moderate affinity against pathogens as opposed to high affinity receptors. Our theory also predicts that an organism’s life-expectancy should strongly impact the cross-reactivity of its immune memory, and we expect organisms with shorter life expectancy to carry more cross-reactive memory. This theoretical prediction can guide more comprehensive cross-species comparisons of immune systems, which is currently missing from immunological studies. (TCPL 201) |
14:30 - 15:00 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:00 - 15:30 |
Jenny Poulton: Fundamental costs of prediction ↓ The ability to predict the future is beneficial to many biological systems. For example, some organisms can react to an environment without glucose by making a costly adaptation to allow processing different types of sugars such as xylose. However, this is only worth doing if the cell can predict that glucose is unlikely to return. Alternatively, in bacterial chemotaxis, the cell must detect the gradient of resources it has experienced to predict whether an area of high resource density lies ahead. To make good predictions, a system must collect information about the current and past state of the environment and this information gathering also costs resources. In this talk we calculate the fundamental limits on the cost of extracting various useful pieces of information about a given environment and consider simple systems able to reach these limits. We discuss how a system can exploit correlations within the environment to reduce the costs of information gathering, and the consequences of the system having made an incorrect guess about the statistics of the environment. (TCPL 201) |
15:30 - 16:00 |
Nicholas Barendregt: Normative Decision Rules in Changing Environments ↓ Decision models based on normative principles have played a major role in our understanding of how the brain forms decisions. However, these models have typically been derived for simple, stable environments, and their relevance to decisions under more naturalistic, dynamic conditions is unclear. In this work, we derive normative models that balance the trade-off between information gathering and time cost to maximize performance (i.e., reward rate, or accuracy per unit time). Using dynamic programming, we find that normative models for stochastic environments exhibit non-monotonic dynamics that are well-tuned to environmental fluctuations. We also show that these adaptive normative models perform robustly even when implemented imperfectly (noisily). We conclude by modifying our analysis to incorporate a finite-energy budget in correlated decision environments. In this ongoing work, we demonstrate that normative models adaptively switch between gathering information and leveraging information from past decisions. (TCPL 201) |
16:00 - 16:30 |
Ryan McGee: Natural selection as the process of accumulating adaptive information ↓ Evolutionary biology seeks to understand how genetic information changes over time to produce organisms that are well-adapted to their environments. While population genetics has developed a large body of theory regarding how genetic variance changes in the process of evolution, we lack correspondingly rich theory describing how adaptive information is acquired by the process of natural selection. The relative lack of rigorous treatments of genetic information is due in part to misconceptions about the meaning of this information and its connection to evolution by natural selection. First, we offer a formal definition of adaptive genetic information that integrates notions of correlational and causal information with a transmission sense of information that captures the inheritance and evolution of genetic information. Adaptive genetic information quantified in Shannon-theoretic terms refers to contents of the genome that represent selective features of particular environments. We show that this information is accumulated by divergent selection but not by non-adaptive processes such as drift, mutation, or gene flow in expectation. In addition, we demonstrate that this view of genetic information is not only of theoretical interest, but also offers a practical measure of adaptive differentiation. Next, we consider the relative effectiveness of natural selection as an information acquisition process. We reframe the ‘learning problem’ faced by an evolving population as a population versus environment (PvE) game, which can be applied to settings such as stochastic environments, frequency-dependent selection, and arbitrary environmental change. We show that the learning theoretic concept of ‘regret’ rigorously captures the efficiency of selection as a learning process. This lets us establish general bounds on the cost of information acquisition by natural selection, and we empirically validate these bounds in an experimental evolution system. We note that natural selection is a highly effective learning process in that selection is an asymptotically optimal algorithm for the problem faced by evolving populations, and no other algorithm can consistently outperform selection in general. Finally, we consider how this framework can be used to assess the value of adaptive therapies for treating cancer and other evolving burdens. Our results highlight the centrality of information to natural selection and the value of learning theory as a perspective on evolutionary biology. (TCPL 201) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner ↓ A buffet dinner is served daily between 5:30pm and 7:30pm in Vistas Dining Room, top floor of the Sally Borden Building. (Vistas Dining Room) |