Tuesday, February 15 |
07:00 - 09:00 |
Breakfast (Kinnear Center 101) |
08:00 - 08:30 |
Aleksandra Walczak: ReRepertoire profiling of T-cell thymic development ↓ Analyzing T cell repertoires from mice from different stages of development, we tried to charactarize selection on these cells at different maturation stages. (Online) |
08:30 - 09:00 |
Anastasia Minervina: Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 public CD4+ αβ T cell clonotypes through reverse epitope discovery ↓ The amount of publicly available scientific data produced as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic, far exceeds any previous effort against a specific disease or condition. This unprecedented situation allows for development and application of new research approaches for understanding immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. Here we describe, how TCR repertoire structure can direct the epitope discovery process by pointing towards the most public and immunogenic responses. We performed an integrative meta-analysis of large public single-cell and bulk TCR datasets from SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals to identify strong and public CD4+ responses, with six prominent TCR similarity clusters. (Online) |
09:00 - 09:30 |
Paul Thomas: Deconstructing the form and function of T cell responses to infections ↓ Human T cell analysis requires knowledge of the specificity (antigen target) and cellular functional profile. These analyses are complicated by the vast potential diversity of T cell receptors (estimated at >1061) and variation in presented target antigens determined by HLA. Here I will discuss approaches to deconstruct this complexity, utilizing TCR distance-based analysis and novel methods for integrating TCR sequence and single cell gene expression data. These approaches will be applied to studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection and influenza vaccination to identify diverse T cell differentiation trajectories and clinically relevant associations with protected and susceptible phenotypes. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:10 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:10 - 10:40 |
Philip Bradley: Generation and selection of T cell receptors ↓ Two loosely-connected topics: (1) genetic influences on the TCR generation process (mostly published), (2) analysis of convergent TCR selection in single-cell data (work in progress, looking for feedback). (TCPL 201) |
10:40 - 11:10 |
Michael Dustin: Fluorescence spectroscopy of CD4 and CD8 coreceptors: insights into T cell receptor signaling and antigen discrimination ↓ "The 'helper' and 'killer' phenotypes of T cells were first linked to the mutually exclusive expression of CD4 and CD8 surface molecules in the 1970s. At the time, however, it was unclear whether CD4/CD8 were simply markers for these cells or in fact directly involved with signaling. Impressive advancements over the next few decades revealed how CD4/CD8 interact with invariant regions of MHC class II/MHC class I molecules, respectively, and bind to the Src-family kinase Lck, thus enabling the single molecule sensitivity of TCR. However, these coreceptor proteins are dispensable when sufficient pMHC is present, and their interactions with MHC molecules are exceptionally weak, with CD8 binding relatively better than CD4 at binding to respective MHC. How can this be reconciled with the well-established roles for CD4 and CD8 in amplifying signaling from the TCR and helping developing T cell discriminate the type of pMHC that engages their TCR?
Through the use of fluorescence microscopy and correlation spectroscopy, we show that CD4 and Lck diffuse together at the surface of live cells, in contrast to recent models in which only a fraction of CD4 have bound Lck. When combined with mutagenesis, our correlation measurements reveal the role of the amphipathic helix of CD4 in stabilizing the interaction with Lck. Experiments with functionalized lipid bilayers and engineered Jurkat T cells also indicate that the CD4-Lck interaction is unaffected by signaling through the TCR, but brightness analysis reveals systematic formation of a dimer of dimers (CD4-Lck)2. Experiments in which CD4 and CD8 are co-expressed with Lck, as in double positive thymocytes, reveal a complex hierarchy of interactions where CD4 has a stronger interaction with Lck than CD8, but conditions can be established where occupancy by Lck is similar. Our results are important for refining current models of coreceptor function and, in turn, how T cell signaling is amplified and antigen discrimination is achieved." (TCPL 201) |
11:10 - 11:40 |
Anton Zilman: Encoding signaling specificity in the presence of cross-talk ↓ Cross-wired pathways where multiple ligands bind the same receptor or activate an overlapping set of downstream regulators, are ubiquitous in signaling in various systems - from the immune system to development. Yet, cells are able to produce distinct responses to distinct ligands of combinations thereof. I will discuss several theoretical approaches to the cross-talk problem and examine their applications on the example of the Type I Interferon signaling. (TCPL 201) |
12:00 - 12:30 |
Alexander Hoffmann: Cracking a Signaling Code ↓ Immune cells must respond appropriately to diverse pathogens or immune stimuli. Four signaling pathways function combinatorially and dynamically to transmit information about the immune threat to nuclear immune response genes. I will present our work on understanding the nature of this signaling code and its capacity and fidelity to transmit information. (Online) |
12:10 - 13:00 |
Lunch (Kinnear Center 101) |
14:30 - 16:00 |
Anton Zilman: Discussion Modeling & Machine learning (Anton & Paul) (Online) |
15:00 - 15:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner (Kinnear Center 101) |