Thursday, May 16 |
07:00 - 09:00 |
Breakfast (Vistas Dining Room) |
09:00 - 09:30 |
Gunilla Kreiss: Stability and accuracy for IBVP revisited ↓ Stability and accuracy for a numerical method approximating an initial boundary value problem are inherently linked together. Stability means that perturbations have a bounded effect on the discrete solution, and is usually characterized by a precise estimate of norms. Such an estimate can be directly used to quantify the accuracy of the method. A very convenient and common way to investigate stability, and hence accuracy, is to use the energy method. If this approach fails one may instead attempt to get results by Laplace transforming in time and using normal mode analysis. Such analysis is usually more involved, but sharper results may follow. In this talk we will show two examples where, even though the energy method is applicable, it is rewarding to consider the problem in the Laplace domain. In the first case we get sharper accuracy results, and in the second case we get sharper temporal bounds. (TCPL 201) |
09:30 - 10:00 |
Margot Gerritsen: Deriving accurate and physically inspired numerical methods for a special class of transport problems. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:30 - 11:00 |
Christina Frederick: Wavefield-accurate seabed classification using localized forward modeling and deep learning ↓ The key to a successful recovery of seafloor characteristics from measured backscatter data generated from SONAR systems is finding a balance between the computational cost of forward modeling and the desired resolution. In the high frequency regime, many propagation models are often limited by costly simulations or unrealistic environmental assumptions, so a detailed recovery is not always possible. There is a growing need for sophisticated mathematical and computational tools that accommodate complicated scenarios, i.e., multiple seafloor layers or uncharted seafloor landscapes. To enable a rapid, remote, and accurate seafloor parameter recovery, we developed an approach a combination of localized forward modeling and deep learning. The idea is to partition environments in width into much smaller “template” domains, a few meters in width, where the sediment layer can be described using a few parameters. Machine learning is used to train a classifier using a reference library of simulations of Helmholtz equations on these domains. We investigate the potential of deep learning for classification of seafloor properties, such as sediment type, roughness, and thickness. (TCPL 201) |
11:00 - 11:30 |
Kelsey DiPietro: Adaptive moving mesh method for partial differential equations ↓ In this talk, I present a robust moving mesh finite difference method for the simulation of
fourth order nonlinear PDEs describing elastic-electrostatic interactions in two dimensions.
The parabolic Monge-Amp´ere methods from [1] are extended to solve a fourth order PDE
with finite time singularity. A key feature in the implementation is the generation of a high
order transformation between the computational and physical meshes that can accommodate
the high order derivatives in the PDE [5]. The PDE derived from a plate contact problem
develops finite time quenching singularities at discrete spatial location(s). The moving mesh
method dynamically resolves these temporally forming singularities, while preserving the
underlying length scales of the problem. I will show how the PMA resolves the singularities
to high accuracy and gives strong evidence of self similarity near blow up.
Next, I briefly discuss the prediction of the touchdown profile for given geometries using
the skeleton theory from [3]. The skeleton set is numerically predicted for a variety of
domains. The predictions of the skeleton method are verified using the variational moving
mesh methods discretized in finite element space [2].
Accurately resolving singularities on general domains motivates recent work in extending the
parabolic Monge-Amp´ere equation to problems on curved domains. Utilizing the optimal
transport boundary formulation from [4, 6] creates a mapping between a fixed computational
domain, on which all derivative calculations are made, to a curved physical domain. This
creates an initial mesh mapping which can be paired to the PMA to adaptively resolve finescale features in the paired PDE. I give results of this method for a variety of examples
including semi-linear blow-up, sharp interfaces and prescribed boundary motion on convex
and select non-convex domains.
[1] C.J. Budd and J.F. Williams. Moving mesh generation using the parabolic monge-ampere
equation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(5):3438-3465, 2009.
[2] K. DiPietro, R. Haynes, W. Huang, A. Lindsay, Y. Yu. Moving mesh simulation of
contact sets in two dimensional models of elastic-electrostatic deflection problems. J.
Compt. Phys., 375:761-782, 2018.
[3] A.E. Lindsay and J. Lega, Multiple quenching solutions of a fourth order parabolic PDE
with a singular nonlinearity modeling a MEMS capacitor. SIAM Journal On Applied
Mathematics, 72(3):935-958, 2012.
[4] J. Benamou, B. Froese, A. Oberman. Numerical solution of the optimal transportation
problem using the Monge Ampere Equation. J. Compt. Phys., 260:107-126,2014.
[5] K. DiPietro, A. E. Lindsay. Monge-Amp\'ere simulation of fourth order PDEs in two
dimensions with application to elastic-electrostatic contact problems. J. Compt. Phys..
349:328-350, 2017.
[6] B. Froese. A numerical method for the elliptic Monge-Amp\'ere equation with transport
boundary conditions. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 34(3):A1432-A1459, 2012. (TCPL 201) |
11:30 - 13:30 |
Lunch (Vistas Dining Room) |
13:30 - 14:00 |
Sara Pollock: A theoretical justification that Anderson acceleration improves linear convergence rates. ↓ The extrapolation method known as Anderson acceleration has been used for decades to speed the convergence of nonlinear solvers in many applications. A mathematical justification of the improved convergence rate however has remained elusive. Here, we provide theory to establish the improved convergence rate. The key ideas of the analysis are relating the difference of consecutive iterates to residuals based on performing the inner-optimization in a Hilbert space setting, and explicitly defining the gain in the optimization stage to be the ratio of improvement over a step of the unaccelerated fixed point iteration. The main result we prove is this method of acceleration improves the convergence rate of a fixed point iteration to first order by a factor of the gain at each step as the method converges. (TCPL 201) |
14:00 - 14:30 |
Mary Pugh: Using Adaptive Time-Steppers to Explore Stability Domains ↓ We've all looked at stability domains for ODE time-steppers. At the
most basic level, these are found by studying how the time-stepper
handles the ODE x' = sigma x where sigma is a complex number with
negative real part. This leads to a stability domain that has a
continuous boundary. The underlying analysis generalizes to systems
of ODEs if the linearized system is diagonalizable. In this talk,
I'll discuss an implicit-explicit time-stepping scheme for which the
linearized system is not diagonalizable; standard stability theory
doesn't apply. I'll demonstrate that an adaptive time-stepper can be
used to explore the stability domain and I'll give an example of a
system for which the stability domain can have a discontinuous boundary;
a small change in a parameter can lead to a jump in the stability
threshold of the time-step size.
This is joint work with my former PhD student, Dave Yan. (TCPL 201) |
14:30 - 15:00 |
Katharina Schratz: Low regularity integrators for dispersive equations ↓ A large toolbox of numerical schemes for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation has been established, based on different discretization techniques such as discretizing the variation-of-constants formula (e.g., exponential integrators) or splitting the full equation into a series of simpler subproblems (e.g., splitting methods). In many situations these classical schemes allow a precise and efficient approximation. This, however, drastically changes whenever “non-smooth’’ phenomena enter the scene such as for problems at low-regularity and high oscillations. Classical schemes fail to capture the oscillatory parts within the solution which leads to severe instabilities and loss of convergence. In this talk I present a new class of Fourier integrators for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation at low-regularity. The key idea in the construction of the new schemes is to tackle and hardwire the underlying structure of resonances into the numerical discretization. These terms are the cornerstones of theoretical analysis of the long time behaviour of differential equations and their numerical discretizations and offer the new schemes strong geometric structure at low regularity. (TCPL 201) |
15:00 - 15:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:30 - 16:00 |
Ann Almgren: Low Mach Number Modeling ↓ Low Mach number equation sets approximate the equations of motion of a compressible fluid
by filtering out the sound waves, which allows the system to evolve on the advective
rather than the acoustic time scale. Depending on the degree of approximation,
low Mach number models retain some subset of possible compressible effects.
In this talk I will discuss low Mach number models for reacting and stratified
flows arising in combustion, astrophysics and atmospheric modeling. (TCPL 201) |
16:00 - 17:00 |
Panel discussion (TCPL 201) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner (Vistas Dining Room) |
20:00 - 21:30 |
Panel discussion II (Corbett Hall lounge) |