Thursday, November 12 |
08:59 - 17:30 |
Homogeneous structures, Morel Theory & Ramsey (other) (Theme for the day) |
09:00 - 10:00 |
David Evans: Topological dynamics of automorphism groups of Hrushovski constructions ↓ Using Hrushovski’s predimension construction, we show that there exists a countable, ω-categorical structure M with the property that if H is an extremely amenable subgroup of the automorphism group of M, then H has infinitely many orbits on M2. In particular, H is not oligomorphic. This answers a question raised by several authors (including Bodirsky, Pinsker, Tsankov and Ne\v set\v ril). It follows that there is a closed, oligomorphic permutation group G whose universal minimal flow M(G) is not metrizable. (TCPL 201) |
10:00 - 10:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
10:30 - 11:00 |
David Bradley-Williams: Reducts of primitive Jordan structures ↓ A primitive Jordan structure is a structure which has an automorphism group which is a primitive Jordan group. This means that the automorphism group acting on M is a Jordan group which preserves no non-trivial, proper equivalence relations on M. I will give a brief survey of examples where results on Jordan groups have been used to obtain results about reducts of primitive Jordan structures. In particular, I will discuss the classification of reducts, up to interdefinability, of any relatively 2-transitive semilinear ordering. (TCPL 201) |
11:00 - 12:00 |
Robert Gray: Set-homogeneous structures ↓ A countable relational structure M is called set-homogeneous if whenever two finite substructures U, V of M are isomorphic, there is an automorphism of M taking U to V (but we do not require that every isomorphism between U and V extends to an automorphism). This notion was originally introduced by Fraïssé, although unpublished observations had been made on it earlier by Fraïssé and Pouzet. Clearly every homogeneous structure is set-homogeneous. It is also not too difficult to construct examples of structures that are set-homogeneous but not homogeneous. It is natural to investigate the extent to which homogeneity is stronger than set-homogeneity, and this question has received some attention in the literature. For instance, it was shown by Ronse \cite{Ronse1978} that any finite set-homogeneous graph is in fact homogeneous. In this talk I will give a survey of some of the known results in this area, including results on countably infinite set-homogeneous graphs due to Droste, Giraudet, Macpherson and Sauer \cite{dgms}, and results on set-homogeneous directed graphs obtained in recent joint work with Macpherson, Praeger and Royle \cite{gmpr}. I will also present a number of interesting conjectures and open problems that remain about set-homogeneous structures. (TCPL 201) |
12:00 - 13:00 |
Lunch (Vistas Dining Room) |
14:00 - 15:00 |
John Truss: Countable homogeneous lattices ↓ (joint work with Aisha Abogatma)
Previously a rather short list of countable homogeneous lattices was known, including, apart from the one-point lattice and the rationals, the countable universal-homogeneous distributive lattice and one or two others arising from amalgamations of certain classes of lattices. We show that there are in fact uncountably many countable homogeneous lattices. Our examples are all non-modular, and the natural question to ask is whether every countable homogeneous modular lattice is necessarily distributive, a conjecture which has recently been proved by Christian Herrmann. Our method also applies to show that certain other classes of structures also have uncountably many countable homogeneous members. (TCPL 201) |
15:00 - 15:30 |
Coffee Break (TCPL Foyer) |
15:30 - 16:00 |
Gabriel Conant: Model theory of generalized Urysohn spaces ↓ Many well known examples of homogeneous metric spaces and graphs can be viewed as analogs of the rational Urysohn space (for example, the random graph as the Urysohn space with distances {0,1,2}). In 2007, Delhomme, Laflamme, Pouzet, and Sauer characterized the countable subsets S of nonnegative reals for which an ``S-Urysohn space" exists. Sauer later showed that, under mild closure assumptions on S, the existence of the S-Urysohn space is equivalent to associativity of a natural binary operation on S induced by usual addition of real numbers. In this talk, I consider the R-Urysohn space, where R is an arbitrary ordered commutative monoid. I will first construct an extension R* of R, such that any model of the theory of the R-Urysohn space (in a discrete relational language) can be given the structure of an R*-metric space. I will then characterize quantifier elimination in this theory by continuity of addition in R*. Finally, I will characterize various model theoretic properties of the R-Urysohn space using natural algebraic properties of R. (TCPL 201) |
16:00 - 16:30 |
Caroline Terry: An Application of Model Theoretic Ramsey Theory ↓ Chudnovsky, Kim, Oum, and Seymour recently established that any prime graph contains one of a short list of induced prime subparts. In this talk we present joint work with Malliaris, in which we reprove their theorem using many of the same ideas, but with the key model theoretic ingredient of first determining the so-called amount of stability of the graph. This approach changes the applicable Ramsey theorem, improves the bounds, and offers a different structural perspective on the graphs in question. (TCPL 201) |
16:30 - 17:00 |
Matthias Hamann: Connected-homogeneous digraphs ↓ A directed graph is connected-homogeneous if any isomorphism between every two finite connected subdigraphs extends to an automorphism of the digraph. In this talk we discuss the the classification of the countable such digraphs. This includes a description of the main classes of these digraphs as well as a discussion of the main steps in the proof of the classification. In the end we give arguments that show that their classification is on the one hand complete but on the other hand still incomplete. (TCPL 201) |
17:00 - 17:30 |
David S. Gunderson: Ramsey arrows for graphs ↓ A simple form of Ramsey's theorem says that for any positive integer m,
there exists an n=R(m) so that no matter how the pairs of an n-set are
partitioned into two colours, some m-subset has all its pairs the same colour.
In terms of graphs, this says if the edges of a Kn are
2-coloured, a monochromatic copy of Km (as a subgraph) can always be found. Such a statement is often expressed in ``Ramsey arrow'' notation. A short survey of Ramsey arrows for graphs is given, culminating in a characterization found with Rodl and Sauer of those triples G,H,r for which there is an F that arrows G when colouring Hs with r colours. (TCPL 201) |
17:30 - 19:30 |
Dinner (Vistas Dining Room) |
20:00 - 21:00 |
Problem / discussion session (TCPL 201) |